Why 70’s units rock + It’s not smooth sailing for a flipping expert

Why 70’s units rock + It’s not smooth sailing for a flipping expert

We continue to follow the journey that Nhan Nguyen started 4 weeks ago where he is attempting to flip a property in 30 days and turn over a tidy profit. It has not been smooth sailing but boy, are we learning some lessons from his experience. Hear what progress has been made in the last week.
Our feature chat this week is with Brad Beer from BMT Tax Depreciation. We find out what he looks for in an investment property, what and who moulded his property thinking, his first property and he gives us some finance tips. We talk about partnerships, the areas he likes and the struggles that most investors experience.
President of the Real Estate Buyers Agent’s Association of Australia, Rich Harvey, slams real estate companies misrepresenting themselves as buyer’s agents and offering free services. He is angry at claims by a company called Seekology, that is out to disrupt Australasia’s property market by offering a service to buyers that is free.
We talk to Tim Godden from Seekology about why he would offer to work for no fee in helping buyers secure a suitable property.  Just what is the business model and how is it going to work?
Michael Yardney reveals why why ’70s apartments rock in his opinion. Is it the architecture, where they are located or is he just reminiscing about his youth? He gives us 5 reasons he likes them.
You will find us at iTunes under podcasts as Real Estate Talk. Listen there for free, leave a review which helps us grow and tells us what you like and how we can improve the show. Don’t forget to subscribe at the site as well –even if you do get the show through iTunes – so that we can tell you about the bonus offers we make to subscribers. Your questions are welcome through the site as well.


Group threatens the status quo – Tim Godden

Kevin:  The term game-changer is quite often bandied around in the real estate industry, a lot of it lately because there are some changes occurring in how agents work. This one is particularly interesting because it came across my desk a couple of weeks ago. It’s about a new business called Seekology. It’s an organization that will help investors and owner-occupiers find the ideal property.
I won’t spend too much time doing any more explanation other than that, but I want to introduce my guest, Tim Godden. Tim is the national director for Seekology, and he joins me.
Tim, thanks for your time.
Tim:  No problem Thanks very much, Kevin.
Kevin:  When I received your first release, it told me that you were operating in an environment where you were not going to take a fee for investors; in fact, you were going to be achieving your income by taking a referral fee from agents. But that has since changed, I understand.
Tim:  We have revisited that pricing model or the structure of the business in that reference and we did that because when we launched we found… As you said we initially said that we were going to receive a fee from the person selling the property. We revisited that because we found that there was firstly a bit of skepticism around that and that is because there are people obviously within the industry that do receive a fee and perhaps give advice based on the fee they’re receiving rather than what’s in the best interest of the buyer. We didn’t want to get confused with that.
What we actually have changed it to be is the fact that we are a free service for property investors – a free buyer’s agent service for property investors – but we do charge for people that are looking for a property to live in.
There’s a number of reasons why we charge for owner-occupiers, and that comes a lot down to the fact that it’s very much an emotional decision; from a buyer’s agent’s point of view, it’s not such a matter of the facts and figures. For an investor, obviously, there’s a lot of research that goes into it, but it does come down to the facts and the figures rather than an emotional attachment to a property.
Because of the interest that we received initially, we found that we were able to run the business successfully with the income that we were receiving from owner-occupiers or people looking for their own property, and then it enables us to help clients find an investment property.
And when we do service those clients and they are extremely happy with their purchase and the end result and the capital gains they received from those purchases, they’ll obviously tell their friends and family and we then develop clients for life. That allows us then to possibly assist them when they do want to buy a property to live in.
Kevin:  One of the reasons, Tim, I was skeptical of these types of services – and we’ve seen a number of them come across our desk. They all talk about being a disruption to the industry. One in particular is a company called Open Agent. We’ve mentioned them before on the show and they are a company who purport to help a seller find the best agent when really it’s only an agent who will pay them a commission. This is one of the problems that I have, and that’s why I’m pleased to hear what you say is that you’ve moved away from that model.
That’s quite an adventurous move, Tim, because that’s actually going to impact your income if you’re not charging a fee for helping an investor find a property.
Tim:  That’s right. We do a few things differently to other buyer’s agents, as well. Our employees are not commission based whereas a lot of other buyer’s agents are. That then allows us obviously to generate more income from the owner-occupier property. That is a change compared to other buyer’s agents.
But we are also a part of a group that is called Australian Properties International, which is basically a one-stop shop for anybody looking to buy a property. They have other departments that we can refer clients to, be it finance or investment coaching, or partners that are accountants and advisors. So there are other options.
We are going to create clients for life so that they will revisit us when they do want to purchase a property. That’s our intent, and that’s where we’re coming from. But in saying that, when we’re working for an investor it’s very much research based and we’re specialty in that regard, as well. It’s not simply just a side avenue to build our client database or anything; we certainly know what we’re doing in that regard, as well.
Kevin:  When it comes to owner-occupiers, you’ll be helping them. What is the fee if I want you to find me a property that suits me and my family and I’m going to move into it? What would be the cost of doing that?
Tim:  It’s 2% of the sale price of the property. We go through the whole process with the buyer, so obviously we go through a full brief. This is slightly different from when we work with investors because we are talking more about facts and figures with investors, but with an owner-occupier, we go through a full property brief with them.
We have access to properties that are off market. I heard statistics only last week that in Sydney particularly, almost 20% of properties are sold prior to them even being advertised on the Internet. We’ve been able to put together a team of people who have a wealth of knowledge and experience but more importantly have built those relationships within the real estate industry so that we can have access to those types of properties and do receive contacts from agents that do have properties when people want to sell them discretely or who don’t want to go through the hassle of marketing the property and we can gain access to those.
That helps owner-occupiers, but it also helps investors because obviously if a property is going to auction or a property is being marketed, there’s going to be more competition in the marketplace for that property and more competition or more buyers who want the property. Particularly if they’re looking to live in the property, it can obviously push the value of the property up beyond what an investor would be prepared to pay or what’s in the best interest of the investor, really.
Kevin:  What sort of research can someone expect, like an investor who comes to you and says “I want to buy an investment property.” You take them through the analysis and analyze what they can afford, what sort of property they should be looking at. What sort of tools do you use to do that, and how can I be sure that you’re giving me the best possible advice, especially if it’s free?
Tim:  We’re very transparent with what we do through the whole process. As you said, we sit down with the investor initially and we go through a strategy meeting, and that’s basically asking them why they want to buy a property and what their desired outcome is. Often they may have already spoken to a financial advisor or somebody in that relation and they know what sort of property they want or they need.
Then we go through a property brief with them that specifies the type of property they want – its features, if they have any specific locations that they want. But often clients may not know the specific location; they simply may have a budget. They may need the property to be cash positive or they may just simply want the property to provide great capital growth over a long period of time. We can then obviously refer them to finance experts to assist with that.
Then we come down to our research side of things. We go through every point of research with the client so that they are understanding why we look at particular aspects – looking at things like, depending on budget, we prefer to buy in inner or middle ring suburbs around CBDs. We look at population growth.
Everything really, at the end of the day, comes down to basically the supply and demand of an area. So when we’re looking at the supply and demand, we’re looking at whether there’s limited free space or limited areas for development in a particular area, whether there are a lot of properties that are very similar to the property that our client’s looking for.
Obviously, the buzz word is oversupply. If there are apartments – and we don’t necessarily work with many apartments, but if there is a lot of one particular property in an area obviously that can affect the supply.
Also when you’re looking at demand, we have a look at areas and look at infrastructure and whether people will want to live there, whether there’s planned infrastructure, whether there are neighboring suburbs that are having growth, whether there are employment options or whether there are going to be employment options and a variety of different employment options.
We go through a whole lot of information with the investor and go through a whole lot of different categories – if you like – for us to consider and for them to understand so that they can be confident in the decision that they’re making.
Kevin:  It’s a great topic. We are out of time unfortunately, Tim. I’d love to be able to talk to you a little bit more, and I’ll get you back into the show to do just that.
Tim Godden has been my guest – national director of Seekology. Check it out for yourself. Tim, thanks for your time.
Tim:  My pleasure. Thanks very much, Kevin.

Buyers Agents Association hits back – Rich Harvey

Kevin:  As you heard just before the break there, talking to Tim Godden about his new model called Seekology where he is purporting to be a buyer’s agent. This has caused grave concern to the Real Estate Buyer’s Agents Association of Australia. Their President is on the phone to me, Rich Harvey.
Rich, why are you so concerned about Seekology?
Rich:  Good day, Kevin. Good to have a chat.
I guess any new company that comes into the buyer’s agent field needs to be very careful about how they present themselves. If someone is going to call themselves an exclusive buyer’s agent, one of the key things the consumer needs to be aware of is to ask the question “How are they remunerated? How are they paid for their service? If they’re claiming it’s a free service, which I believe it is, you have to ask the question why is it free? Are they being paid somewhere else? And is this a sustainable business model?”
Kevin, let me ask you this question. Would you use a free mechanic to fix your car? Would you use a free builder to build your house? I certainly wouldn’t. I want to use the best builder or the best mechanic so that I know my car is safe and my house isn’t going to fall in.
Kevin:  It seems to be a model where one part of the business is going to be free of charge and the other part is where they’re going to be charging a client to buy an owner-occupied property. I find it hard to work out how they’re going to work that out.
Rich:  That’s right. I think good luck to that company if they wish to go down that road, but I guess the key thing is to make sure that they’re doing the right thing by the client.
As an Association, we have a very strict code of ethics and we like to make sure that all of our members follow a strict due diligence code that they put the best interest of the client at heart, that they’re not receiving any secret kickbacks or any secret commissions along the way, and that they’re providing the best possible advice.
You have to just question how good free advice is, because it may end up costing the home buyer or the investor a lot of money down the track.
Kevin:  Rich, do you think the Seekology model or what he’s proposing is a risk to consumers?
Rich:  I do think it is a risk in the sense that it’s not proven. Like I said to you before, I don’t know of too many other models or businesses that stay around for very long that offer a free service. It’s not really a business. You can run a charity, but this is not a charity.
You’re talking about a major asset – at least half a million dollars when you’re buying a property – and if you’re going to have someone that’s representing you for free you have to question how good a job are they going to do for you if you’re not paying anything for it.
Kevin:  Just on that point, Rich, if I could ask you then, if it is a possible threat or a danger to consumers, is there enough regulation around this? Why can someone come in and just open up a business like this?
Rich:  First of all, Kevin, if they’re going to operate as a buyer’s agent, you must have a license to operate in the state that you’re buying that property in. If you’re going to engage a buyer’s agent, check that they have a license to operate in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Perth, wherever they’re buying. Make sure they have a relevant license. That’s number one.
The other thing that needs to be improved, I believe, in the legislation is the licensing and education standards. At the moment, to become a selling agent, you can get a certificate of registration in about five days and then operate under a full licensee. That’s not a long enough length of time to get all the skills you need to operate in this industry.
One of the things I’m advocating to government is that they need to really ramp up the requirements to become either a selling agent or a buying agent and jump through a few more hoops before you start representing people’s biggest asset.
Kevin:  Is that going to happen, Rich? There have been calls for that now for well over a decade and nothing seems to be happening.
Rich:  In New South Wales, Kevin, I serve on a separate committee with the Institute and I’m advocating to the Minister. They’re actually doing a review of licensing as we speak. So there is a review going underway and they are looking at doing that. I’m not sure if it’s happening in Queensland or Victoria or the other states, but it’s something that should definitely be happening.
Kevin:  I know that in some of the states, they have been talking about it for some time, but governments seem to be reluctant to want to get into checking those qualifications.
Rich:  I think one thing that should happen is that there should be some simple regulation around the definition of the term buyer’s agent. We have to make a clear distinction between a buying agent and a selling agent. A buying agent is someone who works purely for the buyer and is paid by the buyer. It’s as simple as that. A selling agent is someone who is paid by the vendor for selling their property. There’s a thing called fiduciary duty, and there’s a pretty clear line between the two.
Kevin:  Well then clearly, Rich, you would have a problem with the current way real estate works broadly in Australia where an agent actually acts on behalf of the seller but also deals with the buyer, because that creates a conflict.
Rich:  Yes, but it can be done well. That’s why people should use more buyer’s agents. Yes, the selling agent there is representing the vendor and they certainly have interaction with buyers, but that’s where buyers need to be aware – not so much skeptical, but just be aware of who they’re dealing with and how the agent is paid. That’s what needs to happen.
Kevin:  I know that in overseas countries they can’t work out how we work in Australia in those areas of conflict because clearly it is a conflict. In America, they have very clear definitions between the seller’s agent and the buyer’s agent.
Rich:  There’s a different model in the U.S. In many cases, there’s a much larger commission at stake – there’s a 5% or 6% commission – and often they have buying and selling agents in the same office, which I think is a conflict of interest. So as much as you think we might have conflict of interest here, there they still have conflicts of interest. And again, they’ve had the same sort of debate between buyer agent and exclusive buyer agent.
I think the key thing here is that consumers need to be aware of the clear definitions of what a true buyer’s agent is and how they’re paid versus a buying agent who also gets cuts along the way.
Kevin: There is a lot of gray here. Just give us the parting message, Rich.
Rich:  The parting message, Kevin, is buyer beware. Make sure that your buyer’s agent is licensed, is experienced, has excellent local knowledge, and certainly is a member of REBAA – the Real Estate Buyer’s Agent Association of Australia.
Kevin:  Well said, my friend. Thank you very much. Rich Harvey is in fact the President of that organization REBAA. Thanks for your time, Rich.
Rich:  Thanks, Kevin.

70’s units rock! – Michael Yardney

Kevin:  As more and more people are deciding to trade up their back yards for balconies – that is, move into units and apartments – we’re seeing an increase in the popularity of this type of purchase, but what do you do? Do you go and buy one of those older ones, which quite frankly I love, because they have extra space in them, or are you going to look at one of the newer units?
Michael Yardney from Metropole Property Strategists is having a talk to me right now about the reasons why you might just want to have a look at some of those ’70s apartments.
Good day, Michael.
Michael:  Hi, Kevin. Good morning.
Kevin:  Yes, I love those older ones. They give you so much flexibility, don’t they? I’ve actually seen people turn their laundries – because they had quite big laundries – into an en-suite to add extra value.
Michael:  There are lots of reasons why ’70s apartments rock. Sometimes they’re a bit ugly from the outside, if we’re talking about the ’60s and ’70s. If you go back a little bit further, if you go back a little bit further, if you’re looking at established apartments, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney, they built them in an art deco style and they really have character, as well. So yes, I see lots of reasons to consider buying an established apartment rather than the ones that are new or a couple of years old.
Kevin:  Is it just my imagination, Michael, or are those ones from the ’60s and ’70s a bit bigger?
Michael:  They are. The town planning regulations were different, the way we were living was different. They didn’t squeeze as many on the block, so therefore, in general, the sizes of them are in the 70 to 80 square meters for a two-bedroom apartment, where often now it’s 55 to 65 square meters. It’s not just that, Kevin; it’s also how they used the space. They had corridors, they had an entrance hall. You didn’t walk straight in and fall over your lounge suite, so I like the floor plan of a lot of them, as well.
Kevin:  Yes, and they had the balconies, as well. Some of the new units simply don’t, or they just have those Juliette ones that you can’t really use, anyway.
Michael:  That’s right. I think another great thing about the established apartments is their location. In our major capital cities in the ’60s and ’70s, they were building these in the suburbs, and often within five to seven kilometers of the CBD. Today, we are also building them, but they’re usually on main roads or they’re in the CBD. So I think their location within the suburbs – and those nice, gentrifying suburbs – are good also.
If you think about it, a lot of them that were built in those days, they were called flats, and they’re what I’d be distinguishing as a flat from what we now call apartments. Those were built, I guess, in general for tenants, but now, most of them are being bought up by investors or owner-occupiers wanting to live there because of the location and because of the size.
Kevin:  And they’re still very affordable, too, even though they’re in, as you said, some of those now highly desirable areas.
Michael:  If you do a price per square meter, you usually find that you couldn’t replace the building at the cost you’re buying established properties, and that’s what I call buying below intrinsic value, below replacement value, which doesn’t really occur when you’re buying the new apartments. So you actually get really good bang for your buck buying established apartments, Kevin.
Kevin:  A bit of history comes with them, too, doesn’t it? They have really good bones.
Michael:  Yes, they do. first of all, they have good bones because they’re not built with papier mâché. Now, I’m saying that sarcastically, but when you have a look at the way some of the new ones are being built, they’re not as solid, but the other thing is they have a history of resale values, so you can see how the property has performed over the years. Has it kept going up in value? Have there been problems with the owners’ corporation? Are there disputes within the owners?
When you’re buying a new property, you don’t have that history; you’re buying it based on what the developer has put on his sale price list, his schedule, rather than the resale values of established apartments, which in my mind, is a better way of putting a value on a property.
Kevin:  Yes, Michael, and you made the point earlier, too, that these flats – as we used to call them – were built for tenants, but now, more and more people are coming and finding these that they can not so much turn them over, but add their extra bit to them, and become and owner-occupier, so the mix is much better, isn’t it?
Michael:  There is definitely. There’s no doubt about it. The other thing that you mentioned is they can add their own bit to it. That’s one of the things I like. One of my strands of my five-stranded strategic approach is adding value. A lot of these ugly ducklings are ready to be improved, and improving the kitchens and bathrooms, which is the main area that sells the property and increases the value. That’s pretty easy to do.
I’m not suggesting you do structural renovations. They’re actually difficult, and often unable to be done, because your ceiling is somebody else’s floor, your wall is somebody else’s, so you won’t necessarily be able to knock out walls. But the comment you made a while ago about changing the laundry into an en-suite or changing a sunroom into another bedroom, you can reconfigure things and you can improve them, manufacturing some capital growth. You can’t do that with newer apartments, Kevin.
Kevin:  So there you go. Next time you drive around one of those ugly blocks of apartments, don’t drive past; if you see one for sale, go ahead and have a look, and open your eyes to the possibilities. Michael, great talking to you, thanks for your time.
Michael:  My pleasure, Kevin.

It is OK to make mistakes – just learn from them – Brad Beer

Kevin:  My special feature guest this week is Brad Beer from BMT Tax Depreciation.
Good day, Brad. This is nice to be talking to you. We’re not going to be talking about tax depreciation, although we might do. I’m more interested in talking to you about your property journey. How are you?
Brad:  Great, Kevin, and great to be here. Love to talk about property, so here we are.
Kevin:  It’s our favorite subject. I don’t think you’ll have much trouble with this one. Why and when did you first get involved in property investment, Brad?
Brad:  Why? I started my job at BMT Tax Depreciation and probably didn’t have much knowledge then about investing in property, but I started probably dealing with clients who were investing in property and making money from them. I thought that was probably a good idea.
When I say a good idea, a good way to probably make some wealth over time. I also had a fair bit of interest in the building side of things – doing a building degree, as well – so the concept of renovating – which I did a bit of – was all pretty good.
Kevin:  How old were you at the time when you started?
Brad:  The first property I bought, I think, was in 2001. That would make me about 23.
Kevin:  I wasn’t probing to see how old you are now; I was just keen to know what your age was then. Whereabouts was that first purchase?
Brad:  The first purchase was a suburb in Newcastle called Georgetown. It was a very old, very bad condition four-bedroom house with a big shed out in the back, almost an industrial style shed. I love that shed. I still own that property.
Kevin:  I was going to ask you whether you still own it.
Brad:  Yes, I still own it.
Kevin:  Did you ever live in it?
Brad:  I did for a period of time, yes. I did renovations on it. I didn’t at the start, while I was at uni, which I did at Newcastle Uni, which I had just finished. BMT had a strong office in Newcastle – started at Newcastle, actually.
I paid $170,000 for it at the time. It needed a lot of work. I found underneath the carpet, newspapers dating back to about 1910, 1912 or something.
Kevin:  Wow, isn’t that fascinating?
Brad:  I worked very hard renovating on nights, weekends to turn it into something better.
Kevin:  When you found those old newspapers, did you do what most of us do and go and look at what the price of real estate was back then?
Brad:  I don’t know I found real estate pages and I don’t know if I was in the mentality. I found some very interesting ads in them and some very interesting stories, though. It was quite interesting.
Kevin:  I remember going to a really old house once we were renovating ,and I dug up some newspapers and found some old Ray White advertising, which I shared with Alan White, who is now sadly passed away. Some of them were actually featuring Ray himself so that’s how old they were.
It’s fascinating to go back and look at what was happening at the time when they put this paper down on the ground. Typically, though, I think they put it under linoleum, didn’t they?
Brad:  Yes. There was newspaper, lino, I think another level of lino, and a couple levels of carpet in that property. They just kept laying it on top.
Kevin:  As a young guy going to uni, you would have had a lot of fun rolling up your sleeves and doing a lot of reno yourself, did you?
Brad:  I had just pretty much finished uni. I was working at BMT. I actually started at BMT in ’98, and I was very hands-on. I also had no money, so I had to be hands-on. After work and on weekends, I was crawling through the ceiling. My dad was an electrician helping me. I had other building mates pulling floors out with me, ripping up carpets, pulling it to bits.
I did a bit of renovating with my father when I was younger, but I learned a lot on that job, and I worked very hard after hours to get it done.
Kevin:  You said earlier that you love the shed that was in the backyard. What was so special about that?
Brad:  It was big.
Kevin:  Okay, a man shed.
Brad:  It’s actually not the nicest looking shed in any ways, but it’s a very large shed that I could rent part of in the past to use and store things in my life. It’s been fantastic for that. When you need somewhere to store that boat that you don’t have any storage for, or campers, or additional cars or parts, four-drive bits, it’s fantastic for that, or renovation materials for people who do some renovation for me. It’s been very handy.
Kevin:  Has that been a good property for you over the years?
Brad:  That property has performed very well. I probably spent about $20,000 on it initially, maybe even a bit less because I did a lot of work myself. It probably leapfrogged me… Being the time late 2001, the New South Wales market moving helped me to leapfrog onto the second property, which we will get on to later.
I did some renovations straight away. I think I got a valuation in less than six months after doing a renovation of about $240,000, and it has rented quite consistently ever since. It’s right near a bus stop, right near a shopping center. It’s not far from the uni.
I’ve done another couple of incarnations of minor size renovations since. I’ve had a valuation recently of about $575,000, I think. It rents for about $500 a week, $495 or something like that. Over that time, it’s performed very well. I’ve renovated it and made it fairly nice where it was.
That area has had good growth over time. Even though New South Wales had some quiet periods after 2003, I suppose, until the late 2000s, overall, that property has performed very well, rented very well, and been a very good property.
Kevin:  From there, you went on to your next purchase. Did you use the gearing or the growth in that property to help you get into the next one?
Brad:  I spent on renovations, so I needed to get some money back. In the early days, when you did run out of money, I probably put some of it on my credit card. Because to buy the first property, cash was always a bit of a problem. Then I had to renovate, and running out of money there was tough. I revalued to get some of that renovation money back, but also the deposit for the next one, which I also bought only six months or so later.
It was the equity that I had gained out of that. Really, I bought it for $170,000. I think the first valuation I did after spending some money came in at $240,000. I borrowed that equity as the equity for the next property and leapfrogged fairly quickly into the next one, and I went headlong back into renovating into the next one, which was interesting, doing the same thing again basically. So that enabled me to get back in fairly quickly to the market.
Kevin:  Where was the second one?
Brad:  The second one was in a suburb only a couple across, in a place called Mayfield and probably didn’t have the best stigma as an area – BHB, lots of black things falling on your clothes overnight. [7:52 inaudible] didn’t like living there for that reason sometimes.
That one, I think I paid about $200,000. It might have been $210,000. It’s a long time ago now. I instantly renovated that up with a $20,000 or $30,000 spend fairly quickly. I think the valuation at the end of the process came in at about $300,000.
I just did another major renovation on that only in the last six months, where I added another bathroom and managed to reconfigure inside to get another bedroom. Its valuation just came in at $600,000, so it’s performed quite well by manufacturing equity and some growth along the way, as well, and has always rented for amounts of money that were pretty good throughout.
I think having owned it for some time and being where it was, it’s had some good growth over time but it also has rented consistently for good returns on the way through, as well. I think it rents for $500 or $550 a week at the moment.
Kevin:  You’ve learned a few good lessons along the way, haven’t you? You’ve told us about two properties so far, which are both still in your portfolio, Brad.
Brad:  Yes, both still in my portfolio. That one, as I said, I’ve just gone through. The first time I renovated, I actually didn’t replace the kitchen, so I probably didn’t quite spend that much the first time but I did rip up carpets, knock out a couple of walls. This time, I actually made a fair bit of change. I got an additional bathroom into the property and with some wall changes and things, an additional bedroom and opened up.
It’s always good to look at getting more space into the property. A lot of these old houses have really big laundries that aren’t necessary and you can fit a decent sized bathroom and a laundry in a smaller area, which I’ve done a number of times, and that was one of those.
I’ve been continually a holder of property. I don’t think it’s always the right thing to do, but selling if you need to for a reason of “I can’t invest in more property because of this and I think there are better growth opportunities” is probably okay, but they weren’t stopping me from investing in other things. They’re performing okay.
There are a couple of properties in the portfolio that I don’t know that I’d buy if I had my time again, but I haven’t necessarily needed to sell them, either. I’ve only ever sold one property, and it was one that I was in partners with and I was getting the partners who were in other things together. We were getting out of partners, it seems, so we sold that building because no one in particular wanted to take it on. It was the only reason, really, for selling it.
Kevin:  I’ll talk to you about partnerships in just a moment because that’s a whole different story. Are there any other properties in your portfolio that you can tell us about that you might have learned some lessons from?
Brad:  I’d say there were ones that have done really well; there are some that I’ve learned some lessons from. My strategy was often – and I have a lot of properties around the Newcastle area – buying what I could manufacture equity because I didn’t have enough equity to keep buying investment properties. You have to watch to make sure that what you’re buying gives you the cash flow, as well.
In an overall strategy, you need a bit of both, but for me, I was kind of equity hungry, so I was buying. I’d buy these properties around the Newcastle area for around $250,000 to $300,000. What I would do is I’d be looking for a bad house in a good street and I’d do renovations. I’d look for things that I could get an additional bedroom out of and make better, revalue, refinance, push my finance really hard.
I’m sure we’ll get into some finance in this interview later. I pushed the finance really hard to free up as much equity as possible so that I could keep going in again.
I have others that you’ve paid that $250,000 or $300,000 and then spent the $30,000 or $40,000 looking for the valuation close to $350,000 to $400,000 so that you could re-free up some of that equity and get your cash back out of that renovation, I suppose you’d say, so you could use it to fund the next purchase and the next renovation.
Some of those properties now – and I still hold them – I look and I have one that I bought probably about eight years ago. I had a valuation done the other day. I think I paid $240,000 for it. I’ve actually done nothing to that one and I have a valuation at $450,000 now. It needs a renovation, and I’m going to do that very soon.
But holding the property and relying on the growth is something that’s definitely worked well for me. But in those early days especially, what I was doing was looking to manufacture equity through renovation, through extra bedrooms, through simply getting my cash back so that I could actually use it again.
Kevin:  That’s very interesting. I’m gathering from the conversation that a large part of your portfolio is in Newcastle – or was. Was that because you were comfortable with that area? Did you know it or is it just strategically well placed for you?
Brad:  I knew the area. I started there. I have a number of properties outside of that area now. Look, one of the problems with that is I pay too much land tax, but it was an area I knew. I think overall, looking at what areas you actually look at should be things that have growth drivers that are going to drive growth in property.
Long term, I like that Hunter area but it has its slow and its better times. I’ve held through those and been able to hold through those, but why I started there, I guess, was because I needed to be able to manufacture equity.
I needed to be able to renovate these properties. I needed to be able to change these properties. I needed to do a fair bit of looking at what I can do with it, which means I haven’t looked at every property I’ve ever bought, but in order to go, “I can change this, change that, and make my big laundry into a nice second bathroom out the back,” it’s a bit harder to do that without looking at that property, so that’s why I probably ended up with a lot of them in the early days there, but I’ve widened since and gone to other states.
Kevin:  Where else have you favored?
Brad:  I have Victoria, and it was fairly early on in Victoria. I bought an apartment, so it was little houses. I bought an apartment in St. Kilda. I paid $360,000 for it, and I would say that’s about ten years ago now.
The thing was it was about 18 months old and someone had overpaid off-the-plan on that particular apartment. It had been oversold. It was very close to Acland Street. I think $430,000 was the original purchase price. I actually bought it for $360,000. It was furnished, and it has consistently rented. It was about $450 or $475 back then. It’s been consistently $500. It’s furnished so it goes up and down a little bit and changes over tenants a little bit more.
I think I re-leased it for $550 a week the other day, which is a little bit light. The furniture is getting a bit older and probably needs updating a little bit, and the market was a bit slow at the time when looking to re-rent it.
But that one has actually performed really well because it’s worth circa about $600,000 now. In that time, it’s performed quite well, that one in particular.
I have another unit in Victoria in a suburb called Glenroy, which is a lower socio-economic area and very close to Essendon, in-between the city and the airport. I’ve only had that for a couple of years, paid mid-$300,000s. It was only a couple of years old, and it’s a townhouse, not a house. It’s been performing quite well. I think the valuation is already 10% above at the time, but the way I bought that was with some other people, so it was already making some money on the way in buy, which I suppose is a good point.
You’re always looking to make some money at the buy point. You don’t want to be there buying something from someone when the new, big first-home owners grants come out because I have too much competition. I want to be there when there aren’t many people there, the house that needs that work, because I think there’s a definite necessity to make some money on the way in as you buy.
I have some property in South East Queensland, as well. That’s been later additions.
Kevin:  What’s the mix there of units to houses? Is there a bit of an equal mix?
Brad:  I would say that it’s mostly houses. Probably 75% would be approximately the case. I’m just building a block of units, so that’s probably going to change that percentage at the moment.
Kevin:  Where are you doing that?
Brad:  That’s in a suburb in Newcastle called Adamstown. I’m actually in partnership on that one. It’s a block of 12 units, so I’ll retain six of those at the end. That’ll change the percentage a little bit, but 75% or 80%. Over the last couple of years, it was more like 90% or 95%, but I bought a couple more units in that later time.
Kevin:  Did you acquire the site in the partnership for that development you’re doing in Newcastle?
Brad:  I did. It’s a good point the way that was acquired. It was a site that was two houses that had a development application approved. Because I’m a property investor, not necessarily a developer, and I purchased it some time ago, I looked at the fact is I bought it as two houses. Developers need to develop to continue their cash flow. It was around the point of the GFC. We paid less for those two houses than the previous people had because they bought it to make it into a development site.
The GFC comes, and it’s pretty hard to get money from banks to do developments. I didn’t have to do developments. I bought them as properties in a partnership and I’m still developing those in the same partnership. Because they actually stacked okay as investments as property, if I wasn’t to develop it, I was happy to hold it, so we ended up with a better situation in the end. It’s probably one of the best property deals I guess I’ve done in time.
Kevin:  Partnerships can be difficult – can’t they – if you go into something, especially like the development side of that and something happens in the partnership and then you have to divide it up, so you have to be very careful who you go into partnership with.
Brad:  I think one of the really important things is that even if you have a good relationship with the partners, should certain things happen, there needs to be a proper “What happens if…” in place, not “We’ll just work it out.”
If one decides they don’t want to develop and wants to sell, what’s the mechanism for everybody to be happy at the end of this? If one doesn’t want to do the development and one does, what’s the mechanism to deal with that problem? Is it that someone buys someone else out? Is it that if one wants to sell, we all have to sell?
Whatever the things that are said, you probably need to draw up a bit of a contract – get the solicitors involved – with “If this happens, this is what our memorandum of understanding between us is. That’s what we do,” and stick to it, both of you.
Kevin:  It’s good to have a solicitor to do that too because sometimes they can ask those really tough questions that in a partnership, as you’re forming that relationship, there are subjects you don’t really want to broach. But a solicitor can broach them and you can talk them through.
Brad:  That’s exactly right. When you’re in and you’re getting in to that partnership, we’re all friends, we’re going to do this development, it’s going to be really great, we’re all going to make some money, enthusiastic, we’re all good friends. But it’s almost like a contract is just in case it goes pear-shaped, these are the rules.
Really, that contract, you want to put it away in the drawer and never get it out again. It’s just if it goes pear-shaped, we know what our expectations are.
Kevin:  You mentioned earlier in our chat that you were in another partnership. Did you learn that lesson from that partnership?
Brad:  Some of those were the same partners in that partnership, so there was no angst in that. I bought one property early in my time that I bought with a partner. That partner decided he didn’t want to be in that property, so I bought him out of the other half of that.
After that, I bought with partners who were actually my partners in BMT so I was already married to them from the partnership perspective, so we had these things in place. I have done it outside of that, but only once – and I didn’t have any problems with that.
I didn’t really have something to learn from doing that probably other than watching in my job, getting involved sometimes at a [21:44 inaudible] as an expert witness in the past. So looking at the way that when things did go pear-shaped, how bad they can get and how people get caught up in those things.
It’s just important to make sure you have “What we are going to do…” set pretty solidly on paper at the start “…if this or this happens?”
Kevin:  You mentioned earlier about buying sight unseen. Have you done much of that?
Brad:  I haven’t done a lot. I think it depends on the type of thing you buy. I think generally for investors, it can actually definitely be done, should be able to be done. I probably have a little block of units and another unit and another unit that I haven’t actually seen. One of them, I’ve driven past out of those.
I actually bought a small block of units in the last few months without having seen it. The thing is it’s out of my area, and for me, probably for mostly time reasons. I actually had a buyer’s agent who bought that for me, so they’ve seen it. Someone has seen it.
I don’t necessarily think it’s always necessary because I’m not looking to do renovations and looking to manufacture equity. I just like the investment. I like the drivers and the growth in the area and I’ve had someone who’s had a look at the property and recommended it.
Kevin:  A trusted advisor, really, isn’t it?
Brad:  Yes. It’s important to have plenty of those around you. Absolutely.
Kevin:  As a successful property investor, Brad, what’s the most common question you get asked?
Brad:  I think about that and there are probably a couple of answers to that, more than just one. “How did you get started?” is probably the most common, followed by “How did you keep going?” Probably normally the younger person would say, “How did you get started?” Probably the person who has invested would say, “How did you keep going?”
A large percentage of investors in Australia only ever buy one investment property, and it’s because they either had a not so great experience or through lack of, really, the education on the way property investments should be done, they don’t push that next level. So probably mostly those two.
Kevin:  First to second property is the toughest, and you said most people never get past their first. They probably get into two or three, then have to settle down because they’ve made some big mistakes along the way. Were there any points for you along the way where you went, “Oh, I think I might have gone too fast, too quick here”?
Brad:  Absolutely.
Kevin:  Can you remember when that was?
Brad:  It was probably one situation. The first one was very hard, as you say, and one of my biggest mistakes was probably saving for longer to get a 20% deposit. That wasn’t the question. I leapfrogged to the second one fairly quickly and the third and the fourth, and then I slowed a little, but then I really went hard and I had renovations going on all over the place – and you can burn cash really fast when you do that.
That was really one of those times when I had settlements and refinances. If you don’t really plan and make sure you’ve finished that one, you revalue it, you get your cash so that you’re ready for your next one, you can run out of cash very quickly in that situation. It’s a bit like developing; you run out of cash in that situation fairly fast.
Making sure you’re on top of the things, that you really have a plan of what you’re going to do. Yes, I came pretty close once because I had about three renovations going at once. I had a big one that I just finished and I was a bit slow refinancing a couple that I had done not long before that. All of a sudden, you have $50,000 out there on that renovation and $50,000 on that one, etc. That just compounds so fast.
I got myself into a point where I was like “I actually need to go back and calculate how quickly I need this refinance to come through in order to make sure I have the cash to do the things that I’m doing at the moment.”
You should never put yourself in that position; you should always be ahead.
Kevin:  Nothing wrong with making mistakes in anything in life as long as you learn from them.
Brad:  I did, absolutely.
Kevin:  Would you buy overseas, or have you ever bought a property overseas?
Brad:  I haven’t. It doesn’t mean I never would. I have probably looked into it, especially probably the U.S. around five, seven, eight years ago or maybe even a little longer, about that time after GFC where there were lots of cheap properties, etc. I never made the jump. I was never convinced it was the right idea completely. It doesn’t mean I never would but no, I haven’t at this stage.
Kevin:  Do you have a mentor or someone you follow or you think is a particularly good example or role model?
Brad:  I don’t have one in particular. A lot of my learning came from being across the industry very heavily within my job, and it would mean that I would listen to many. I don’t have a particular mentor in life, but what I do is actually surround myself with people who are good at it, have done a lot of it, are better at it than I am so that I can actually learn from them all the time. I think it’s very important to learn, but I don’t have a particular mentor.
Kevin:  Are you looking around for another property now? If so, what are you looking for?
Brad:  I’ve changed what I’ve been doing. I’ve probably been a bit slower in the buying at the moment because I’ve been building a block of units and a couple of houses on things that I’ve done DAs for in the past.
The answer is I’m always looking. I’m always open to the concept of… The relationships I have with many agents throughout the country is “Call me if you have the screamer deal.” Am I actively out there looking for the screamer deal? No, but I do have the ability to finance these things fairly quickly based on the way I’ve structured my finance. If they have what they believe a screamer deal is, I’m always open to suggestions.
Kevin:  There’s a call-out for agents if ever I heard one.
What’s the worst property investment you’ve ever made?
Brad:  That’s very simple. I bought land in a holiday area.
Kevin:  Me, too.
Brad:  The thing is I actually still own the land.
Kevin:  Do you? I got rid of mine.
Brad:  Because it hasn’t stopped me from investing in other things.
Kevin:  Is it still vacant land?
Brad:  It’s still vacant land, yes. I probably will build on it eventually. It kind of stacks okay but not enough for me to get interested in spending the time. The thing it doesn’t do is stop me from investing in other things, and it was also quite inexpensive in the scheme of things.
But at the time, it was fairly early in my investing – I think it was the third property I bought, or it might have been the fourth – and it wasn’t the right time. I did have a long time for settlement, so it didn’t necessarily slow me down necessarily but it still was a bad decision in hindsight.
Very simple, and it’s often the mistake. As far as lifestyle properties, I just think you should buy property for an investment that’s good for investment. Make money. Go on holidays where you want to go on holidays with that money.
Kevin:  Yes, and that’s going to make you some money along the way. The block of land we bought was in an area like you, a holiday area where there was tons of land coming on. The only way we could ever get rid of it, of course – we were competing with all the other blocks – was to do a JV with a builder who built it, and then we sold it as a house/land package, and we just took out the land value. That’s the only way we could get out of that one.
Brad:  I could do that. If another local agent, someone really came with decent money and wanted it, I’d probably sell it, but they also don’t need to. I think I’ve probably taken all the slow period of no growth. I think there’s probably more potential for it in the future. I’ve taken the hurt, so I continue to hold on.
Kevin:  Fair enough.
What’s the most important piece of property advice anyone has ever given you? Was it your father?
Brad:  No, my father wasn’t a property investor, and I think that’s a piece of the learning. I grew up in a country town with one of four children, and my dad was an electrician. My mum didn’t work, which I think was fantastic – not that that’s right for everybody but it was good for our family. In that age bracket, they bought their house and they paid it off. That was how it went.
My dad wasn’t the property investment advice person. I love him to death; don’t get me wrong. But I think the best piece of advice was to probably learn as much as you can about what you’re doing. And I didn’t up until when I bought the first property.
The benefit is I became a depreciation expert and I went to lots of property seminars and everything under the sun on property, often talking about depreciation, just as one expertise piece. But I listened to many people over that time to learn what I could learn.
And I still do. I still go to things and listen to what else I can pick up. I also get motivated and excited then and start going back and thinking about my portfolio again, which is something you need to do on a more regular basis sometimes than you do.
Look at someone who does it well and learn from them probably is some of the best advice I think you could give.
Kevin:  It’s interesting, because I think you’ve probably been to every property seminar in Australia. I think every one that I’ve been to I’ve seen you at, so you’ve had that opportunity to learn many, many times.
Brad:  I’ve been to way more than most.
Kevin:  It’s interesting, though. Every one you go to, if you’re clever, you’ll always pick something up from every one.
Brad:  I still do. One is run by the same people who I’ve been to before, I often like to sit through. Firstly, when I give a depreciation presentation, it’s good for it to connect. Secondly, I can always pick up a couple of little bits of things in learning for myself out of them.
Kevin:  Before I let you go, the biggest lessons you’ve learned along the way, some things that we can learn from now.
Brad:  I think read and learn about property investment as much as you can. If you think you’ve found the right properties and you’ve looked to buy those, crunched numbers, and things, I think one of the biggest keys to being able to continually buy property really is to actually learn about finance – learning how to use finance to take away a lot of the risk in investing in property, learning how to put some pressure on the lenders, to structure the finance the right way so that it covers your risk.
I can’t stress enough how important knowledge about finance is and knowledge about how to get what you want out of that can actually reduce the risk in investing.
We talked earlier about my father and that generation. You grow up, you buy your house, you pay it off and that’s really great. You get old, retire, and you have your house as an asset. Often, that’s a lot of what is there. Now, finance enables you to do something different to that, which you can, but you need to learn how to harness it, use it to take a lot of the risk out of property investing. That’s what I’ve continued to do and have a big belief in financing things correctly.
Kevin:  We’re about to wrap this up, so let’s get a nice little plug in there for BMT Tax Depreciation, one of our great supporters. We thank you for that, Brad, and all of the team at BMT.
The best piece of advice you can give any property investor would be…?
Brad:  Make sure you get a depreciation schedule because 80% of people are missing out on money and leaving it at the tax office.
Kevin:  Does that ever amaze you, that there are so many people who don’t do it?
Brad:  Every single day. And I’m just blown away, all of the things about investing in property, about learning how to do it well, learning how to make sure you buy the right property, do all these things – and depreciation, so many people don’t learn and therefore miss out on money. You’re investing in property to make money, so I don’t know why. It’s like telling the tenants that instead of paying $500 a week, you should pay $400 and we don’t do that, do we?
Kevin:  That’s right. Brad, it’s been great talking to you, mate. Thank you for sharing so much information about yourself. It’s been wonderful to get to know you in a different sense. Thank you for all of your support, too.
Brad Beer from BMT Tax Depreciation. Thanks, mate.
Brad:  Great, Kevin. Glad to be here.

Week 4 of the flipping challenge.  Has it worked? – Nhan Nguyen

Kevin:  Here we are in what is now week four, probably, in fairness, jumping over to week five, as well – a bit of a combination over the last couple of weeks – of our journey with Nhan Ngyuen, where we’re looking at the flipping exercise where he’s secured a property and is looking at flipping it and making it profit in a 30-day period.
Nhan, welcome to the show once again.
Nhan:  Good day, Kevin. How are you doing?
Kevin:  Good, mate. Just a very quick summary for those who are probably needing to catch up: Nhan found a property on the Southside a few weeks ago, he put it under contract for $320,000, and in no time at all secured a contract for $410,000. That crashed on a termite inspection.
Last time we spoke, you had another offer in your in-tray for $405,000 – a bit less, $5000 less – that came with a building and pest inspection and a finance clause, as well. I think last time we spoke, Nhan, you told me that you were going to go ahead and do the pest treatment. Is that right?
Nhan:  Yes, absolutely. We ended up doing the pest treatment just to cover our backsides, and we supplied the building and pest report to the buyer, as well, just to let them know that this is where we at and there are some termites on the property – not a lot, but there are – and we’ve treated the termites, as well.
Kevin:  So have you now gone through that building and pest and those finance clauses on that contract?
Nhan:  Yes, we have. With the building and pest, they didn’t even do their own building and pest report, they just used ours, the one that we supplied, and I was really happy with that. He rang up the building and pest inspector just to verify the report, what the concerns and the issues were, and they were all cosmetic.
Especially with the property being 50 or 60 years old, as a lot of properties are in Brisbane and Queensland, it’s not uncommon to have some dry rot and issues there. But yes, they’re not structural issues, just cosmetic issues. And in the meantime, the finance has been approved with the Commonwealth Bank. They did the valuation, and yes, they’ve gone unconditional, which is really exciting.
Kevin:  That’s good. I’ll ask you about settlement in just a moment, but I just want to stay on that building and pest report, because there’s a big lesson in that. I think last time we spoke, I asked you if you were going to share that report, and you said you didn’t really have to, but obviously, you made that decision that that’s what you’d do, and that probably helped you get this across the line a bit quicker.
Nhan:  Yes, I think so. With the buyer there, I just did an open-book, transparent situation where I said, “You know what, this is our building and pest situation, and if you have any questions or concerns, please tell me now, because I don’t want you crashing the contract two weeks or one week into the process. Just let me know now and we can put it back on the market.”
That’s one of the risks you take when you’re selling a property. You sign a contract, most of the time you take the property off the market for a week, two weeks, three weeks.
Kevin:  Last time we spoke, you were about to settle on the property yourself, which meant that you’d have to use your own funds to get you through to when it settles with this now purchaser we know about, who we didn’t fully know about last time we spoke. So you have settled on the property, that’s correct, isn’t it?
Nhan:  Yes, that’s right. We settled on the property recently, and I just used my own funds; I actually didn’t use any bank funding. The reason for that was this contract was coming through thick and fast, and I just settled with cash. The bank funding has been in the background and ready to go, however, now that we know definitely that the buyer is going to go ahead, we’re not going to require that bank financing any longer.
Kevin:  Very good. Okay, let’s look at a couple of dates now. As we said, you have settled; you now know this is an unconditional contract. How long will your finance have to be in the property? What period of weeks?
Nhan:  Originally, the contract of sale was 60 days, and that was going to be about seven weeks that my funds were going to be in there. However, I’ve negotiated with the buyer now to give him a small discount to cover him with one month’s interest.
The situation there was he’s going on holiday for a few weeks, and the property was going to be vacant with him being away, so he definitely wanted a 60-day settlement. I’ve been able to negotiate with him to get a shorter settlement and me subsidizing, let’s say, $1500 of the purchase price so that he can cover that interest, and he’s really happy with that.
Kevin:  That’s a win-win all around, isn’t it? You’re going to get a quicker settlement, which means you can pull your funds out, and you’re going to pay the additional funds he would have cost in that period of time. So that’s a win-win; that’s a great negotiation.
Nhan:  Yes, it’s really a win-win. He’s really happy with that. From settlement to settlement, with my funds in to my funds back out, we’re looking at actually 21 days. I know that this 30-day challenge is something that’s artificial, from settlement to settlement was my original parameters, but if I can do it within 21 days, I’m really happy with that.
I know it’s not the full $410,000 that we originally sold at, but you know what? We bought it for $320,000. I say to people that you make your money when you buy, not when you sell, and that’s where I created the equity and gave me a whole stack of room to be able to negotiate and turn the property around in a really short period of time.
Kevin:  You’ve had a few extra costs here that you didn’t budget for. One was fixing up the termites, and then paying the purchaser $1500 or whatever it was to cover his interest payments. Have you done the calculations now? Do you know what you’ll end up with at the end of it?
Nhan:  I haven’t done the final calculations, but we’re looking at roughly $70,000 net. A purchase price of $320,000, plus tax duty, legals, advertising. I think we spent originally $200-300 on advertising. We bumped that up when the first contract crashed to I think $1000 on RealEstate.com.au.
It’s going to be somewhere between $68,000 and $70,000 – because we didn’t sell via an agent, as well; we sold privately – from that $405,000, and there are going to be some legal costs on the other end. Luckily, we don’t have any bank fees to pay, so I would say we’re looking at somewhere between $68,000 and $70,000 net before tax.
Kevin:  And you’d calculate putting your own money in there too; you’re taking that out, as well?
Nhan:  Yes, the cost of that money will come out to about $1000 or so with interest, maybe $1500. Look, I’m not too concerned about that; it’s just not having that access to those funds.
Kevin:  A cost of business, isn’t it? Yes.
Nhan, on with the next deal, I guess. I might just touch base with you when this all does finalize, just to see what the final wash-up was once it settles, and then we might talk about your next deal.
Thank you for sharing this journey with us over the last three or four weeks, and we’ll catch up with you as soon as the property does actually settle.
Nhan:  Yes, I’m really excited about it. I know when I originally launched the challenge to the public and the people in my circle, I thought “You know what? This could fly or this could fail,” and I’m really pleased that it has come together. I am looking at putting together a $100,000 challenge in maybe a 30 or 60-day period. We’ll see if that comes along, and then we can float it and see what people can do.
Kevin:  Good. I look forward to talking to you about that as it comes up. I’ve been talking to Nhan Nguyen from Advanced Property Strategies. Nhan, we’ll talk to you in the next week or two. Thanks, mate.
Nhan:  Thanks so much, Kevin.

  • Vincent Lee
    Posted at 21:01h, 15 September Reply

    I’ve got two properties next to each other. Both of them have a caveat of only single dwelling allowed. My question is : will it be allowed to have half of one of the property be combined with the other property to form a bigger property so that I can build a tennis court at the back of the newly combined property? Thanks!

    • Kevin Turner
      Posted at 09:22h, 19 September Reply

      Where is the property Vincent? Kevin

Leave a Reply